Comfort is a Protestant writer and speaker. He is vilified by Atheists for challenging their dogma named 'Evolution.' Evolution, as Atheist apostle Richard Dawkins stated, is the scientific philosophy which fulfills Atheistic cant. In this vein, the naturalist theology of Darwin, purportedly supports pond-scum to people, and indeed nothing to everything as Comfort states.
It is a lie when an Atheist-Darwinist states that they don't believe in abiogenesis, or that Evolution does not offend the first 2 laws of thermodynamics [energy and matter beget the same, and the law of entropy or system decline]. It matters not if the 'system' of life is either open, closed, or a hybrid. Matter and energy are needed to create the same, and all systems fail and degrade – no matter how open or close they are. Period. Evolution is thus in opposition to two of the most fundamental laws known to science.
This fact and 1 million other objections make the cult of Evolution a non-science, a theology, a cult, a dogma premised on reducing men and women to the status or lemurs or pond scum. With such a perverted and twisted view of reality anything is possible – murder, eugenics, abortion, euthanasia, theft – nothing matters because there is no free-will, no logic, no reason, no morality, just a bunch of molecules knocking about driven forward in the frenzied 'natural selection', survival of the fittest. What a load of garbage.
Comfort on the dogma of Darwin's cult and the fools who reside in it:
...stupid speculations of Darwinian evolution, blindly embracing an unsubstantiated, unscientific fairy tale for grownups, because they foolishly think that it deals with the moral dilemma of having to face God], and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools [Another amazingly perfect description of the atheistic evolutionist. He embraces an imaginary theory that came from the over-fertile mind of a man bitter at God because of the loss of his beloved daughter. And so the atheist calls all who don’t believe as he does an unscientific knuckle-dragger], and changed...
Comfort: atheists’ aggressive agenda is to remove God’s name from schools, from currency, from nature programs, and from history books, and at the same time fill movies and television with His name used in blasphemy.
There is no mechanism for gene insertion or genomic software code change during or after the embryonic process. None. How and why would a reptile want to fly ? Cats are cats. Snakes are snakes. A sparrow is just a bird.
Where are their transitional species either found in the natural world [shouldn't there be many hybrids of reptirds ?] or in the fossil record ? Not one single artifact exists supporting dino to bird, or reptile to bird macro-evolution. None.
Why did hundreds of thousands of animals, fish, reptiles, and birds (over millions of years) evolve a female partner (that coincidentally matured at just the right time) with each species?
Why would a heart develop if there is nothing to pump? Why would there be blood without a heart ? Why would there be a circulation system without blood ? How would 'nature' know to make insulin to manage the sugar level within the blood supply as it enters cells ? Why would natural processes create a complex protein of 51 amino acids like insulin without the entire system being present and how would it produce this protein complexity to manage glucose to an insanely detailed degree ? Where is the proof ?
Comfort: blood vessels evolved before there was blood, why did they evolve if there was no such thing as blood? And if the blood evolved before the heart evolved, what was it that kept it circulating around the body?
Instead of screaming that their cult is 'science', maybe Evolutionists need to actually provide proof for their theory. As it stands now, the facts are against Evolution to such a degree, that in the future their cult members will be equated with flat-earthers, Martian believers and those who held that Venus had the same climate as Earth. A bunch of dunces.