Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Climate models are failures, because the coding of these applications was a fraud to start with. 95% of climate models are so far divorced from observational reality that they are useless. This is no surprise to those of us who inhabit the world of software. We know that models imitating complexity and many to many relationships are nearly impossible to build, when the complexity of those relationships stretches from the thousands into the millions of possible variable interactions. Given our ignorance of climate, model failure is a given.
The cult of warm is not about science, but philosophy. The presupposition and world-philosophical-view behind climate model creation by quackitists and quackademics is that the 20 ppm [parts per million] of natural necessary Co2, which is emitted by mankind, causes an atmosphere akin to Venus, where Co2 is 95% of the atmosphere. There is no relationship between Venus and Earth but this is what the cult of science demands us to believe. If we are not careful, the 20 ppm trace chemical will become 950 thousand ppm. This is to put it mildly, beyond stupid. Yet this philosophical-materialist world-view, so roundly applauded by the cult 'science' and their political benefactors and media; indicates that Co2, which is mandatory as the vital part of the complex process to allow life, is now a toxin and pollutant.
This unscientific, amoral and inane assertion is taught as 'fact'. In reality there are quite likely 1 million interactions in climate including the local, regional, and cosmic. Feedback loops within and between the various levels of climate interaction are complicated and poorly understood. This reality ensures that climate models will be dismal failures.
I have been in Software for 20 years, I can assure you, that modelling the climate is impossible and will always be inaccurate. You can’t model many to many relationships, including those you don’t even understand……
“Perhaps most important of all, however, is the 31 researchers’ conclusion that “even areas of substantial agreement among models may not imply more confidence that projections are correct, as common errors or deficiencies in model parameterizations may provide false confidence in the robustness of future projections.” Link
and
A real scientist: “These are all interesting exercises, but they miss the most important point: the climate models that governments base policy decisions on have failed miserably. I’ve updated our comparison of 90 climate models versus observations for global average surface temperatures through 2013, and we still see that >95% of the models have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH): Link
Climate scientism is a fraud. It is about money, grants, power, control and egos. It has nothing to do with science.
1/3/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion (continued)
1/1/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion
12/31/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Government Control
12/30/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval (continued)
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Competing with The USA
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –CDM (Clean Development Mechanism)
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto (continued)
12/27/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto
12/26/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice (continued)
12/25/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice
12/24/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade (continued)
12/22/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade
12/20/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto, The Environment and the WTO
12/19/2010 America vs. Europe – IPCC
12/18/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto
12/17/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models (continued)
12/16/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models
12/15/2010 America vs. Europe – Criticisms of Kyoto and the IPCC
12/14/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/12/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/11/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory
12/10/2010 America vs. Europe – Statism, The Kyoto Protocol and The Environment