Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
There is no climate emergency. 1107 scientists state the obvious. Climate totalitarianism will pick up where the Corona Fascism left off.
https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/WCD-version-06272215121.pdf
“Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted
The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth
CO2 is not a pollutant
It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favourable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.”
1/3/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion (continued)
1/1/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion
12/31/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Government Control
12/30/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval (continued)
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Competing with The USA
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –CDM (Clean Development Mechanism)
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto (continued)
12/27/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto
12/26/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice (continued)
12/25/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice
12/24/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade (continued)
12/22/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade
12/20/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto, The Environment and the WTO
12/19/2010 America vs. Europe – IPCC
12/18/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto
12/17/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models (continued)
12/16/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models
12/15/2010 America vs. Europe – Criticisms of Kyoto and the IPCC
12/14/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/12/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/11/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory
12/10/2010 America vs. Europe – Statism, The Kyoto Protocol and The Environment