Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
by Terry Pearson, edtr of www.rightpoint.org - article is from rightpoint.org
Imagine if you will, you are a judge presiding over a criminal trial. The Crown Prosecutor stands up and says, "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I say to you 'unequivocally,' that providing our computers are right, and providing the DNA evidence is correct, we are '90 percent certain' that the defendant is 'very likely' guilty."
Now as a judge, you would have two options.You would either break out in hysterical laughter, or you would sit in stunned silence, while you shake your head in amazement at the ineptness of what you have just heard.
If you are sitting in the jurors box, you obviously wouldn't buy the crown prosecutors summation, so it's a unanimous decision. The defendant is not guilty.
Why then would you buy into the hoax that says man is mainly responsible for global warming?
"Oh yes," you say. But that's the conclusion of the over thousand scientists on the UN's IPCC panel
There will be other scientists, who will go over that report with a fine tooth comb and debunk it in the end. Oh, but we have to be careful, because the socialists will tell you that these other scientists are shills for big oil. After all we are supposed to believe IPCC panel of scientists, who reached their conclusions in secret meetings behind closed doors, by a show of hands. As Rex Murphy once reminded David Suzuki, "E=MC2 wasn't arrived by a show of hands."
The IPCC panel is funded by the UN, the same organization which was recently involved in an oil scam themselves. This also begs another question.Who funded, or is funding David Suzuki, as he crosses Canada in his CO2 belching bus? Are you beginning to see the picture here.
In a realistic analogy of the recent IPCC report, Rex Murphy hit the nail on the on the head, when he said, "In the great Y2K alarms, you will remember there were all sorts of hideous scenarios... a great crash of all the world's computer systems, planes falling out of the sky at midnight as the millennium turned, security nightmares. Nothing happened, of course, except billions upon billions of dollars spent to avert a non-catastrophe"
Over the last five years, I have exposed most every ism there ever was in socialism as a fallacy or a hoax. Just keep and open mind and stay tuned to this web site. It won't take you long before you start scratching you head and wondered why you ever believed in liberal policy in the first place.
How good am I? I predicted that Paul Martin's 40 billion dollar quick fix on healthcare for a generation would be a total failure. I also predicted Stephane Dion's win right from the very start.
I'm not a scientist, nor am I a mechanic, but I know when a used car salesman is trying to sell me a pig in a poke. I also know that just by using simple logic, when the liberals are lying the moment they speak.
As a reporter for a small town news paper during my high school years, I learned something that they don't appear to teaching in Ryerson or the universities of higher learning. That is when you gather the facts, you ask how, why, when, and where. Of course this can be a disadvantage when you are interviewing a socialist. Not only they avoid the answers. But they cut and run.
I also provide examples. This recent piece from the Cherranna Star happens to be a good one. It starts off this way:
As is so often the case, the Canadian public is far ahead of their politicians – especially those who "lead" by following opinion polls. Most Canadians, it seems, want Canada to meet its commitments under the Kyoto Protocol. Well, they have it right. They have it right from the standpoint of combating climate change, from the standpoint of international law, and from the standpoint of Canada's standing in the world.
Oh! Well check this out from the Ottawa Citizen – an online survey of close to 3,000 Canadians by Innovative Research found that just 31 per cent of respondents agreed with the statement that Canada must do its part to fight global warming, and implementing the Kyoto accord is "the best way to do it." Roughly double that number -- 59 per cent -- agreed Canada must do its part, "but implementing the Kyoto accord is just one way we can do it."
Let's go back to the Cherranna Star, where the writer commences with a personal attack:
'As for Canada, judging from new Environment Minister John Baird's record-breaking use of the word "science" in one interview, our government now accepts the inconvenient truth about global warming. And, however inconvenient, it is no less true that Canada must get serious about its Kyoto targets. Not because these targets would bring us anywhere near solving the climate problem, but because they get us on the unavoidable road to the much larger cuts required in the future. It may well be that Canada cannot reduce its greenhouse gas emissions enough to meet its Kyoto targets. But that is not what the Kyoto Protocol requires of us. The protocol specifically allows countries to supplement efforts at home through reduction credits acquired abroad.'
Note the last part, " It may well be that Canada cannot reduce its greenhouse gas emissions enough to meet its Kyoto targets. But that is not what the Kyoto Protocol requires of us. The protocol specifically allows countries to supplement efforts at home through reduction credits acquired abroad"
OK Great, now how does buying credits from abroad, work in order to stop global warming? The article doesn't inform us that at all. But instead, a whole piece of un recyclable news paper real real estate was wasted by attacking the conservatives on their environment policy.
Which brings us to the to the last question. Who wrote this article? It was Jutta Brunnée is professor of law and Metcalf Chair in Environmental Law at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law. Awesome!
Here is an intellect, who needn't tell us how buying Kyoto credits work, because us "beer and popcorn" bumpkins would be just too stupid to understand.
This smacks of the story of the emperor and his clothes. (We all know that one) It's the story where two con artists (Had to be liberals!) are weaving clothing for the emperor. The emperor says, "I don't see any material" The con artists reply, as they go through the motions, "Of course not, you have to be an intellect, in order to see the cloth." The rest of the story tells us of the child who pointed out that the emperor wasn't wearing any clothes.
In this case, you can bet your boots, Brunnée is wearing no clothes. It's the same way the liberals scam the public. There is absolutely no substance at all in what they say. But they are all intellects, (Does Michael Ignatieff come to mind?) — And you have to be an intellect in order to see the cloth.
The whole article tells us how great Kyoto is. But it doesn't tell you why it's so great, because you have to be an intellect in order to see the cloth. Do you call that journalism? That report could well have been written by kid in grade ten. But it's well representative of the liberal media mafia from out of Cherranna.
For example, if I want to tell you why Stephen Harper is great, I'll list some substantive reasons. I'll use another time to bash the liberals and their scams.
Just in case you missed it, here is how the Kyoto Hoax works in a nutshell. Three guys, Peter, Paul, and Joe walk into a bar and sit a table.
Peter lights up a cigarette, and Joe, who has emphysema, starts to cough and wheeze. Another guy walks over and says, "Hi my name is Jack Layton, leader of the NDP party." He goes on to say, "As you know we advocate the Kyoto protocol, which is a program to prevent green house gases. My suggestion is that if Peter buys a 10 dollar credit from Paul, it would solve Joe's problem."
Between coughs and sneezes, Joe replies, "Good idea Jack. I want you to know that I have always supported the NDP."
Why are the Canadian socialists especially adamant about Kyoto? The answer is simple. It's all about Alberta's wealth. Was Jack Layton mistaken, when he called it, "Big ass oil?" The Cherranna socialists are envious of Alberta. Is it any wonder they are green..Keep in mind that China, which is not a signatory to the Kyoto scam, is set to build 562 new coal fired plants.
What is the cost of implementing Kyoto? Some reports say it will shrink the global economy by 20 percent. So how would that effect us personally? A 20% decrease in the world economy would eventually trickle down to us all. We could look for a tax increase of about 20 percent. An increase in energy and utility costs at around 20 percent. An increase of unemployment to around 8 percent.
Voting liberal in the next election would mean a rape of the Alberta economy, which will result in economic devastation across the country, very similar to what we had during the Trudeau years. As it is, your grand children, will still be paying for the Havoc bought to this country by Trudeau. There is no doubt that the liberals would do the same thing to Canada as Bob Rae did to Ontario.
The liberal plan for Canada would be a recipe for disaster so devastating, it would most surely split the country at the Alberta Saskatchewan border.
reprinted from www.rightpoint.org all rights reserved.
1/3/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion (continued)