Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
To believe in Evolution, you must be bio-chemically ignorant and obviously slept through grade 9 chemistry. Evolution not only offends scientific laws around energy, matter, entropy, but also bio-chemical reality. For example - there have never been, and never will be, a 'Darwinian' [read rhetorical], 'mechanism' [meaning 'we don't know']; to convert amino acids into life; or magically create RNA, DNA, amino acids, ATP, poly peptide bonds and all the other complexities of a single cell at the same time, and arrange that complexity into processes to generate life. Neither is there any observable evidence that macro-evolution occurs, or that even, single cells 'mutate' into trillion celled organisms. None. You can't say 'well in the future we will solve these riddles'. By definition that is not science, but faith. Evolution is bio-chemically stupid.
Charles McCombs, Phd: “As a Ph.D. Organic Chemist, I have to admit that the formation of amino acids under these conditions [the famous and fraudulent Miller-Urey experiment of 1953 which produced 2 dead amino acids in a contrived lab experiment....] is fascinating, but there is a major problem. Life was never formed in that experiment. The product was amino acids, which are normal everyday chemicals that do not "live." Even unto this day, there is no known process that has ever converted amino acids into a life form, but this fact does not stop evolutionists from claiming that this experiment is proof that life came from chemicals. Evolutionists know that amino acids do not live, but they call this proof anyway because they claim that amino acids are the building blocks of life.”
Then there is the grade 11 problem of bio-chemical chirality. Apparently the cult of Darwin slept through that class as well.
“Chirality is probably one of the best scientific evidences we have against random chance evolution and chirality totally destroys the claim that life came from chemicals. Obviously, this is one fact they do not even want to discuss.
Chirality is a chemical term that means handedness. ....Your hands may appear to be identical, but in reality, they are only mirror images of each other, hence the term handedness. For this reason, chirality can exist as a right-handed or a left-handed molecule, and each individual molecule is called an optical isomer.
What is the problem of chirality? In our bodies, proteins and DNA possess a unique 3-dimensional shape, and it is because of this 3D shape that the biochemical processes within our bodies work as they do. It is chirality that provides the unique shape for proteins and DNA, and without chirality, the biochemical processes in our bodies would not do their job. In our body, every single amino acid of every protein is found with the same left-handed chirality. Although Miller and Urey formed amino acids in their experiments, all the amino acids that formed lacked chirality. It is a universally accepted fact of chemistry that chirality cannot be created in chemical molecules by a random process.”
So the lab of life – Miller and Urey's fake experiment way back in 1953, with no subsequent updates or replication – produced 2 dead amino acids out of 20 total amino acids that make up proteins, both lacking chirality. They were also mere byproducts, devoid of any relationship to 'life'.
“Miller’s experiment did produce the amino acids, but only by continuously circulating the reaction mixture and isolating products as they were formed. The quantities were still tiny and not in the same proportions as found in nature.
One of the causes of the low yield has been identified by Peltzer who worked with Miller. As the amino acids were formed they reacted with reducing sugars in the Maillard reaction, forming a brown tar around Miller's apparatus. Ultimately, Miller was producing large compounds called mellanoids, with amino acids as an intermediate product.” [J. Peet, Bsc, Msc, PHd, CChem, FRSC]
There never was an experiment which proved that bio-chemical random chance would produce life. There is no known mechanism to create amino acids 'from a soupy pond', which then magically form into proteins. Proteins themselves are only made from transcripted DNA code through a manufacturing process within ribosomes. Therefore, they cannot arise without the singular complexity of an entire cell structure.
It is quite obvious that evolution offends basic chemistry and is disconnected from science.