RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, February 25, 2024

Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part one).

Newtonian gravitation is not proof of heliocentricity.

by StFerdIII

 

 

The claim

There is a severe paucity of proof for heliocentricity.  The theory is simply accepted as fact, without mechanical and observational verification.  There is voluminous evidence from the 19th and 20th centuries which contradicts and disputes both heliocentricity and its apologist framework, the Special Theory of Relativity.  The errors and lack of mechanical proofs are covered extensively in a previous set of posts.

 

In this post we will have a hard look at what is incorrectly forwarded as Newton’s key ‘law’ that smaller bodies always orbit larger.  This is usually offered as ‘proof’ of heliocentricity, but as we will see when discussing the greater universal forces at work, this is not the case.  In fact, this supposed ‘law’ provides more evidence for geocentrism than Copernicanism, a consideration that is anathema to ‘The Science’. 

 

What did Newton say?

Newton neither said nor proved that a smaller object must always orbit the larger.  Newton merely stated that when we have two or more bodies in a rotating system, all bodies will revolve around the center of mass (also known as the center of gravity).  It is a natural effect and phenomena that the ancients probably well understood: 

 

“That the center of the system of the world is immovable: this is acknowledged by all, although some contend that the Earth, others that the sun, is fixed in that center” (Isaac Newton, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book 3: The System of the World, Proposition X, Hypothesis I)

 

Our own solar system and ‘milky way’ galaxy is not a closed system.  It is open and a part of a far larger universe.  This is one of the problems with Einstein’s thought experiments - he assumes a closed system. If we did have a closed system and there were only 2 planets namely the Earth and Sun, then the corrupted Newtonian claims that the smaller object or Earth would orbit the larger body the Sun, would likely be sensible and valid.  But that is not our reality.  There is a little factor called ‘the rest of the universe’ which Newtonians and Copernicans often ignore.  The universe is estimated to contain five sextillion stars.  Quite a mass of weight one would imagine.

 

Where is the center Chud?

 

In Newtonian physics the center of our solar system must find its location at the ‘center of mass’, which would consider all the bodies and masses within our solar system (ignoring for the moment the rest of the universe).  The displacement of this center within our solar system would of course not be the Sun itself, but would find its locus at quite an appreciable distance from the Sun.  Now add in the rest of the universe beyond our solar system.  The ‘center’ would need to migrate and be displaced even further from our Sun.  There is no proof that the center of universe is located with our Sun.  Such a claim, if ever made, has no empirical evidentiary support. 

 

As Fred Hoyle the famed physicist and astronomer (who believed in panspermia, and space-travelling ‘viruses’) stated:  “If a new body is added to the set from outside, or if a body is taken away, the “center” changes” (Hoyle, p. 85).  This makes perfect sense.  We should take into account the weight within our solar system, our own galaxy and other galaxies (new planets, comets, collisions causing destruction etc) when assessing mass attraction, gravity and the impact on inertial motion.

 

If we add in the ‘weight’ of the universe there must be an enormous impact on bodies within our solar system.  This implies that there is no ‘law’ that the Earth must revolve around the Sun given the displacement of this center.  It might well be that the Sun and planets revolve around the Earth in a Tychonic or Ptolemaic system, which current scientific observations would support as easily as they would support a Sun-centric view.  Or it might imply a completely different model not yet considered by ‘The Science’. 

 

The center of all masses

Given the size and mass weight of stars and bodies in our universe, there will be many local centers of mass.  These federated and local systems do not impinge or supersede the center of mass for the universe itself.  This means that each galaxy will have its own center of mass.  This seems logical.  While the constellation of planets in our solar system will have a center of mass near the Sun; and while the moons of the planets have a center of mass near their respective planet, these are only local centers of mass.

 

When we consider all the mass of the universe, there is only one place where the universe’s center of mass exists.  Newton’s principle given above that the ‘center of the system of the world is immovable’ does not mean that heliocentricity is proven.  There are many models which fit the observational data.  If for example, the universe was in rotation, Newton’s laws would demand that it rotate around its singular center of mass.  This could be the Earth (or not).  As Hoyle states it, the equivalence between heliocentricity and geocentricity was recognized not only in geometry, but also in the gravitational and inertial dynamics:

 

“…we can take either the Earth or the Sun, or any other point for that matter, as the center of the solar system. This is certainly so for the purely kinematical problem of describing the planetary motions. It is also possible to take any point as the center even in dynamics, although recognition of this freedom of choice had to await the present century” (Hoyle, p. 82)

 

Most physicists accept the concept that, “Mass there governs inertia here.” Newton never took the mass of the universe into account, and this is a primary inadequacy of his theory of motion (Misner, et al pp. 543). 

 

Newton’s Oubliette

Newton failed to consider the gravitational and inertial forces found in the rest of the universe when he composed his laws of motion.  The missing parts of his theory directly affect the choice one makes for either Copernicus, Ptolemy or Tycho Brahe. As the Brazilian physicist, Andre Assis, puts it:

 

Leibniz and Mach emphasised that the Ptolemaic geocentric system and the Copernican heliocentric system are equally valid and correct…the Copernican world view, which is usually seen as being proved to be true by Galileo and Newton…Despite the gravitational attraction between the sun and the planets, the earth and other planets do not fall into the sun because they have an acceleration relative to the fixed starsThe distant matter in the universe exerts a force…..on accelerated planets, keeping them in their annual orbits.” (Assis, pp. 190-191)

 

This is an important point, ‘The distant matter in the universe exerts a force…..on accelerated planets’. Without such forces, the Earth would indeed be swallowed by the Sun.

 

Mach power

 

The principle of ‘equivalence’, based on Kepler and Mach’s maths, was enunciated by Einstein to explain uniform acceleration in an ‘inertial system’.  The Special Theory of Relativity does not account for acceleration, nor non-linear motions.  There are no absolutes in STR, and everything must be relative (many posts have gone through the proofs of why STR is unscientific). 

 

But if we accept at face value Einstein’s incorrect model of the universe, we can see that heliocentricity is just a theory as given by this principle of equivalence.  STR has never proven heliocentricity, nor has it done much to fix the gap in Newton’s laws of inertial motion.  Einstein uses 2 systems, one called ‘A; and the other ‘I’ to explain:

 

“Let A be a system uniformly accelerated with respect to an “inertial system.” Material points, not accelerated with respect to I, are accelerated with respect to A, the acceleration of all the points being equal in magnitude and direction. They behave as if a gravitational field exists with respect to A, for it is a characteristic property of the gravitational field that the acceleration is independent of the particular nature of the body. There is no reason to exclude the possibility of interpreting this behavior as the effect of a “true” gravitational field (principle of equivalence) (Einstein, p. 14.)

 

A is a system in uniform motion with respect to another system within a defined grid or system.  Within A but outside of I, objects are accelerated whose movement will not only be impacted by the gravitational attraction within system A, but also from the total mass of attraction which includes I.  This indicates that within our own solar system, not only the Sun but the planets and every other moving object in our system (comets, asteroids, moons), are controlled by the galaxies and the collective attraction and weight.  This ‘true gravitational field’ or principle of equivalence removes the mystery out of inertia and why the planets travel in precise orbits.  

 

“Kepler’s standpoint is particularly interesting, since he was deeply impressed by Tycho Brahe’s ‘demolition’ of the crystal spheres. Kepler posed the problem of astronomy in the famous words: “From henceforth the planets follow their paths through the ether like the birds in the air. We must therefore philosophize about these things differently.” (J. Barbour, p. 9.)

 

Kepler, the Protestant astronomer whose maths were the first theoretical proofs to support Copernicanism, came up with a rather ‘Machian’ solution.  Kepler’s maths suggested that the planets could not possibly follow such precise orbits by a mere inspection of empty space.  The elliptical and complicated journeys must be guided and driven in their motion by the real masses in the universe, namely, the Sun and the sphere of the fixed stars.  This insight by Kepler pre-empted that of Mach by some 300 years and is perfectly aligned to what most physicists believe today, namely that the mass of the universe is an essential ‘force’ which accounts for the observational data on planetary motions.  

 

This supports Mach’s principle which was in large measure a restatement of observations by the English astronomer George Berkeley in the 1700s:

 

(Encyclopedia Britannica) “Mach’s principle, in cosmology, hypothesis that the inertial forces experienced by a body in nonuniform motion are determined by the quantity and distribution of matter in the universe. It was so called by Albert Einstein after the 19th-century Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach. Einstein found the hypothesis helpful in formulating his theory of general relativity—i.e., it was suggestive of a connection between geometry and matter”

 

The Kepler-Berkeley-Mach ‘principle’ means that there are absolutes including mass and gravitational attraction.  Even Newton admitted that this was valid. 

 

More here


Article Comments:

Related Articles:

Scientism

4/13/2024:  4 reasons why E=mc2 is wrong. Einstein made very basic mistakes when interpreting this equation.

4/6/2024:  Positrons and plasma disprove Einstein, STR and E=mc2. Anderson's 1932 experiment.

4/4/2024:  Einstein was wrong. Quantum Mechanics, Plancktons and the real world of particles.

3/30/2024:  Einstein and his Ether. Refuting his own theories of Relativity and make-believe.

3/22/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part six).

3/15/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part five). The Earth's 'bulge', geosynchronous satellites,

3/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part four). The Foucault Pendulum

3/7/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part three)

3/3/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part two). Forces which Copernicanism cannot explain.

2/25/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part one).

2/21/2024:  Scientism and the Galileo myth. Another example of 'The Science' and its mendacity and propaganda.

2/18/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 4). Dayton Miller and 30 years of proofs which negate STR

2/17/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 3). Georges Sagnac and the ‘Sagnac effect’

2/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Scientism (part 2). Post-1905 experiments which found no movement of the Earth.

2/6/2024:  Is Heliocentricity a ‘proven fact’? Or is it just more Scientism dogma?

1/13/2024:  $cientism and Wind Turbines, aka the Bird Choppers, the Bat Manglers

12/16/2023:  A Federated model of World Government enabled by the religion of 'Science' or Scientism

12/11/2023:  Scientism and geology. Georges Cuvier and proofs from the 19th century about ‘catastrophism’

12/3/2023:  Scientism and Special Theory of Relativity. The paradigm is ending. Too many issues.

11/19/2023:  Scientism - James Webb Telescope and disproving the Banging Religion

11/12/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (b), A layman’s overview of STR

11/11/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (a), A layman’s overview of STR

11/4/2023:  $cientism: Germ and Virus theory nonsense. Béchamp’s experiments which disprove germ theory

11/3/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part II

10/27/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part I: From a real Scientist into Scientism.

10/26/2023:  Scientism and the myth of Long Ages. The Grand Canyon as an example.

10/18/2023:  Scientism and Long Ages. Isotopy and Isochrony dating suffer from a long litany of issues.

10/14/2023:  $cientism and Long-Ager Theology. Radio-Carbon dating and its inconvenient issues.

10/6/2023:  ‘Fossil Fuels’ and Scientism, from the 18th century to the modern era. Irrational dogma.

9/30/2023:  $cientism and Hydrocarbon reality. Hydrocarbons are NOT ‘Fossil Fuels’

9/22/2023:  $cientism and demonising Plant Food. A critical look at cars, ‘emissions’ and real science

9/17/2023:  Supernova’s and Banging. Models & metaphysics twisted to fit the narrative of the Banging religious

9/11/2023:  From Aristotle to the Big Bang and its metaphysical gospel.

9/2/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Part Two: ‘Redshifts’ and endless time.

8/26/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Confusion, bafflegab, arcane maths, money. Part one: Radiation

8/19/2023:  The Science Delusion. Big Bang Theory as an example of $cientism

8/18/2023:  "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health"

8/8/2023:  Alfred Russel Wallace on the deaths, injuries and fraud around 19th century vaccination.

8/5/2023:  Forgotten History and Pharmaceutical Criminality: 1918 'Spanish Flu' epidemic; 1976 ‘Swine’ Flu

8/5/2023:  The coming ‘Klimat’ Lockdowns based on $cientism.

7/29/2023:  Globaloney Boiling. The $cientism of ‘Klimat’

7/28/2023:  Georgian-era medical Quackery and ‘Professional Medicine’.

7/28/2023:  Mattias Desmet: 'The Psychology of Totalitarianism'. Mass acceptance of the Corona Fascism

7/23/2023:  US Deep State institutionalising the Corona Scamdemic through a new Federal Agency (OPPR)

7/21/2023:  $cientism and the Great Pharmaceutical Fraud

7/21/2023:  "Jabbed:How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, Government Stick It to You and Your Family"

7/18/2023:  Dr Chas Michael Higgins, ‘Horrors of Vaccination Exposed and Illustrated’ (1920)

7/13/2023:  Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Exposing the $cientism of a criminal complex

7/13/2023:  Dr Walter Hadwen, MD, MRCS, MRCP ‘The Case against Vaccination’ (1896)

7/11/2023:  Dr Charles Creighton, 'Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History' (1889)

7/5/2023:  The Covid Fascism and $cientism as a ‘global’ template for future ‘pandemics’

7/3/2023:  $cientism and its inherent Anti-White, Anti-Christian bigotry

7/3/2023:  $cience and the HIV 'virus' - another scam to create a U$ 500 billion industry

6/23/2023:  The Smallpox quackcine fraud - death rates went up post the Smallpox Stabs.

6/20/2023:  19th century Smallpox vaccine efficacy and data fraud. $cientism in the age of Jenner.

6/18/2023:  The Quack and the Vaxx-Religious: Saint Edward Jenner’s Smallpox drug failure, Government Investment

6/16/2023:  Overview of Saint Jenner the Quackcine Charlatan who created the criminal vaccine industry.

6/14/2023:  Scientism: The New Orthodoxy. A metaphysical and religious project.

6/14/2023:  Scientism and Saint Jenner, the case against the Apostle of the Smallpox Stabbination.

6/10/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky – The Good and the Not so Good. A peasant, layman’s view.

6/5/2023:  Velikovsky, Catastrophe and Einstein. Einstein was wrong. All hail 'The Science'.

6/4/2023:  'The Science' said there was life on Venus. So what happened?

5/30/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky and 'In the Beginning'. An an age of stupid, question everything.

5/24/2023:  Read the book: 'Dissolving Illusions (Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History)'.

5/5/2023:  The Religion of $cientism

5/1/2023:  A Brief history of $cientism

4/27/2023:  Scientism, Nominalism, Brzezinksi and the 'New World Order'

4/21/2023:  BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film

4/13/2023:  'Dark Moon. Apollo and the Whistle-blowers'. Mary Bennett, David Percy. 1999. Aulis publishing.

4/10/2023:  US Federal Government, from the Moon Hoax to the Corona Caliphate

4/3/2023:  Scientism, Hollywood, the Idiot box; and the Moon Landings. Red Pilling.

3/20/2023:  Reality and its discontents. Scientism.

3/11/2023:  The Religious Dogma of Government Sponsored Scientism

3/3/2023:  The War on Reality. Nitrogen, Food supply, Depopulation, the Great Replacement and $cience

2/18/2023:  Green Fascism, Net Zero, and Anti-human, Scientism

1/31/2023:  Scientism and the New Secular Religions

1/2/2023:  The Divine Right of $cience replacing Christianity

12/15/2022:  Scientism and the Cult of Lies

12/1/2022:  Scientism: From the ‘Enlightenment’ to Corona and Climate Thingy Changey.

9/19/2022:  Edward Feser, ‘Five Proofs of the Existence of God’

8/26/2022:  'Proofs of God', by Matthew Levering and the cult of modern ‘Scientism’.

6/22/2022:  Kenneth B. McIntyre, a critic of modern philosophy and ‘rationalism’

5/29/2022:  Edmund Burke, 'A vindication of natural society'. A book still relevant today.

5/11/2022:  Melanie Phillips and 'Upside Down', more real today than ever

4/28/2022:  Chateaubriand and his critique of the irrational 'French Enlightenment'

4/22/2022:  Russell Kirk and Ideology

4/6/2022:  Russell Kirk and Tradition

3/28/2022:  Isaiah Berlin and Monism

3/21/2022:  Eric Voegelin and the Religion of Reason

3/16/2022:  F. A. Hayek and the Road to Serfdom (Corona, Authoritarianism, Irrational governance)

3/8/2022:  C. S. Lewis and the Abolition of Man (and reason)

2/21/2022:  Michael Polanyi, a scientist protesting scientism

2/7/2022:  Heidegger’s Critique of Rationalism

12/5/2021:  Wittgenstein, modern cults and the abasement of truth with language games

10/26/2021:  Nietzsche and the end of Reason and the fantasy of Democracy

9/10/2021:  Alexis de Tocqueville – a critic of the irrational Enlightenment

8/30/2021:  Semmelweis reflex. Rejecting truth due to your worldview.

8/18/2021:  Follow 'The Science' they scream. Which 'science'? From who and why?

7/27/2021:  The Religious Cults of Scientism are anti-reality, Christophobic, Fascist.

7/19/2021:  Edmund Burke: From ‘The Enlightenment’ to the cult and Religion of Rona

6/14/2021:  THE Enlightenment and the erasure of Homo Sapiens

6/7/2021:  ‘The’ Enlightenment and Scientism and the cult of non-Science

5/26/2021:  Scientism and the scientific mafia of establishment non-science

5/9/2021:  In the modern Dark Ages, 'I Jab therefore I am' is considered 'science'

4/2/2021:  Pope Francis, Bishop Spong, Barry Wilson and the Evil within the Church of Christ.

11/19/2020:  The cult of Science - face diapers as an example in the post-truth world.

9/8/2020:  GlobaloneyWarming Science Fiction

8/15/2020:  Michael Crichton and the Age of Ignorance parading as Science

8/5/2020:  C.S. Lewis and 'The Abolition of Man' by Steve Turley

7/4/2020:  Rome, Greece, Islam - primitive philosophies with primitive ideals - unlike Christianity

3/10/2020:  Atheists have destroyed the credibility of science

1/4/2020:  Globaloney-Warming: 43 Failed Green Fascist Predictions - Zero correct, every single one wrong

12/19/2019:  Fake Climate Science and made up numbers: Australia

12/11/2019:  The Green Reich: Global Warming to the Green Tyranny, Drieu Godefridi

11/26/2019:  The Age of Stupid, the Cult of Stupid: GlobaloneyWarming, Climate-Change, Climate-Emergency

11/19/2019:  The Climate cult of Stupid, Corruption, Fiction

11/7/2016:  Church of Evolution and the impossibility of chance forming anything

10/23/2016:  Big Bang theology and Virgin Births. Evolution and Scientific, Cosmological Dogma.

9/21/2016:  'Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed' by Douglas Axe

7/20/2016:  Evolution, Embryos and Cult of Science fraud

7/12/2016:  Political Science and the cut of Scientism

5/2/2016:  The cult and unholy church of 'Science'. Lies, fraud, propaganda, and of course money and power.

2/25/2016:  Cult of science; magical formation of life, planets and trillions of Earths!

2/5/2016:  Alan Fensin, '13 facts that humans do not cause global warming'.

1/14/2016:  John Hudson Tiner’s 'History of Medicine and Founder of Modern Medicine: Louis Pasteur'

7/29/2015:  Maxwell, Morley and Einstein. No conflict between faith and reason.

4/23/2015:  There is no science, within a cult of science.

1/23/2015:  2014 one of the coldest years in the real record. Globaloneywarming. A cult of fraud.

1/14/2015:  What is Science? It is not Scientism or the cult of Science.

1/2/2015:  Watermelons: How Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, James Delingpole

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/18/2014:  Bruno Latour and the cult of science. Fetishes in place of facts.

11/23/2014:  Consensus Science. There is life on the Moon, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars....

11/10/2014:  Cults of Scientism; no science, lots of dogma, cant, theology and miracles

10/14/2014:  Scientism and the cult of Fraud er Globaloneywarming

10/9/2014:  Keynesian-Central Bank 'Scientism'. Central Bank 'models' vs reality

10/6/2014:  The Quackery of Lysenko, Globaloneywarming, Darwinism.

8/15/2014:  'Literalists' and Scientism, and the cults of pseudo-science

7/13/2014:  Darwinism and the cult of scientific materialism

6/30/2014:  Aristotle's non-science cult of scientism. Hand-waving and conjecture is not science

6/26/2014:  Velikovsky's importance - he challenged the dogmatic cult of Darwin