RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII -

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, April 13, 2024

4 reasons why E=mc2 is wrong. Einstein made very basic mistakes when interpreting this equation.

Another example of 'The Science' going off on the wrong path, unwilling and unable to correct itself.

by StFerdIII




Energy = mass (x) the speed of light squared.  There are many problems with this equation, which Einstein did not invent, but interpreted as part of his fantasy world of Relativity.  Prior to Einstein, various physicists including Isaac Newton, Jules Henri Poincaré, and Olinto De Pretto had proposed the equation.  Einstein derived the equation starting from the result of relativistic variation of light energy.  He appropriated the equation and its concepts without due attribution – which was a distinctive Einsteinian feature.  Why bother acknowledging the work of others?  He rarely if ever did. 


This short post will briefly describe the basic mistakes within the E=MCequation.  Many other posts go through the 1905 Special Theory of Relativity (STR) and why it is wrong (you can start with the fact that space is not a vacuum).  This post will add to these postulates.


Error #1:  Einstein rejects basic kinetics

STR as a theory is at its core, riddled with paradoxes and contradictions (see Herbert Dingle for the clock paradox).  So too is Einstein’s interpretation of E=MC2.  Einstein took this simple equation and then contorted it with paradoxical ideas of mass and energy. 


What does the equation mean?

Einstein’s general interpretation, kE=MC2 defines a relationship between mass and kinetic energy.

1.     when a body of mass is accelerated it gains mass and energy

2.     when a body of mass is decelerated it loses mass and energy

3.     the mass increase/decrease for all matter is proportional to each body’s kinetic energy (relative to a common position of rest for all matter)


What does this actually mean?  For Einstein in this interpretation of E=MC2, energy and mass coexist together.  The key is the kinetic energy for that body and its mass.  If we take an object and accelerate it at a given velocity, the kinetic energy in that velocity will contribute to the overall mass of that body.  This is achieved through ‘Joules’ or the measurement of kinetic energy.  One Joule has a mass of 10-17 kg.  A kilogram of mass will therefore weigh 1017 Joules. In this interpretation a Joule of energy is a quantity of energy, and it is also a quantity of mass.  Thus, bodies in motion will possess both Joules of kinetic energy and Joules of kinetic mass.  If the body in motion slows down, it will be losing kinetic energy, and Joules.  Its mass should therefore decrease as well. 


Einstein refused to accept this.  He did not believe in deceleration to be a meaningful measurement or concept which can be independently differentiated from an acceleration.  He also did not believe that an absolute position of rest could be determined because the mass changes caused by motion, in his view, can never be measured locally.   Einstein did not believe in any absolutes as there are anathema to STR.  All of these suppositions are simply wrong.


Error #2:  Einstein did not understand that photons have mass


Einstein never performed experiments.  He was a thought philosopher with mathematical skills.  Einstein’s did not understand that the primary meaning of E=MCis to define the mass of photons (light) as the truest measure of a mass (the base as it were of mass measurement).  Einstein arbitrarily declared, based on his own ego one assumes, that the photon was a particle without mass.  This error now permeates all of science. It is absurd. A particle with no mass would have no momentum or motion.


All particles have mass. Photons have a mass of at least 10-50 kg.

In his thought experiments Einstein used Planck’s Constant to make the transformation between the mass of an atom and the energy of a massless photon.  By failing to give the photon mass, he was unable to divide Planck’s constant into its component parts h=MλC, namely that the mass of a photon times its wavelength times the speed of light.  Rejecting the mass of the photon completely upends the point of E=MC2


If we admit that the photon has a mass, there is no case where that mass is converted into energy.

·       Any mass will have energy that can be measured

·       Energy has mass that can be weighed

·       Mass and energy by definition cannot be separated into the mass of matter and the energy of photons


We can conclude that mass and energy are the two primary parameters of both matter and photons.  One cannot exist without the other.  There is no such thing as the long cherished metaphysical idea ‘pure energy’.  Back on planet Earth we only have pure ‘mass-energy’.


Error #3:  Einstein did not understand anti-matter


Positrons and anti-matter are discussed in some other posts.  Positrons were discovered from 1928-1932 and Einstein could never wrap his head around the concept that antimatter and positrons were the latticework of space.  Space has never been a ‘vacuum’.  Space is full of antimatter and positrons which are real particles with real mass.  This means that matter cannot be converted into energy. 


How does this work?

·       Photons are produced by atoms

·       Photons are made from equal pieces of positive matter (proton) and negative matter (electron).

·       Neither a proton nor an electron can produce a photon by itself

·       A photon is the result of a joint effort between a proton and an electron with each contributing an equal amount of their mass and energy to make the photon


In this process, the creation of a photon (light particle), requires an equal quantity of positive matter (positron) and negative matter (electron).  There is no way to convert ordinary matter into photons except in the extremely small quantities produced by atomic radiation.


A core tenet of STR is that there is nothing in space, just a frictionless vacuum.  We know this is entirely wrong.  You can start with radiation which permeates space and makes speace travel impossible.  Radiation has energy and mass.  Beyond this the universe is absolutely filled with positive matter (protons) and negative matter (electrons).  


The problem for Einstein’s view of mass and energy is that when two particles couple together to form a hydrogen atom for example, they emit a series of photons in a process that begins very much like the annihilation between a positron and electron.  Both the proton and the electron will lose equal amounts of mass to the emitted photons as they drop down into the ground state where the process stops and the atom becomes stable. Einstein never supported antimatter nor the real process of photon creation.


Error #4:  Einstein never proved relative motion


Einstein failed to understand that all photons travel at C (speed of light which we know can vary through the ether), through the same inertial reference frame (inertial meaning the existing motion of the object) and not just relative to observers.  Einstein made the speed of light relative to the observer’s frame.  While it is true, as Einstein claimed, that all observers will measure the speed of light to be (c) in any frame, it is not true they measure the same quantity.  


Einstein never proved his assumption of ‘relative’ motion, which by itself is wrong. The Doppler effect (measuring the relative motion between a source and observer), means that we can measure the difference between acceleration and deceleration, and between motion and rest.  Just because Einstein never bothered to measure absolute rest, does not mean that absolute rest does not exist.  For example, there is the absolute motion of photons which Einstein ignored.  If photons move with absolute motion, then the motion of matter must also be absolute.  Einstein should have known that:

·       M=E/C2  (to rearrange the equation) which defines a body of matter’s excess mass associated with its absolute motion through rest

·       When a body of matter is accelerated to any velocity (v) relative to this frame, its mass increases with its kinetic energy KE=MC2

·       At a velocity of about 86% of the speed of light, a body’s mass is doubled with a kinetic mass that is equal to its rest mass


The above can only occur within a single frame of reference for all matter.  We know that matter gains mass when it is accelerated, and it also gives up that mass when it is decelerated. All photons and all electrons in a given reference frame have identical masses. 


Therefore, a precious tenet of Einstein’s theorems and STR, that there are no absolutes, is fundamentally wrong.  The most basic mistake was made by Einstein, namely, by using the Doppler effect he concluded that all motion itself was intrinsically relative.  Einstein failed to believe in a fixed frame that connected all forms of motion.  However, with a more careful look at the Doppler effect, one must conclude that a common absolute motion for all photons must exist.


Bottom Line


That E=MC2 is wrong will never be taught at school or shown in the science propaganda.  Despite the rather basic mistakes of Einstein, ‘The Science’ has enshrined this equation to demi-god status.  Yet it is utterly incorrect and leads real science down the wrong path. 


This equation also has nothing much to do with ‘nuclear fusion’ or fission, which is the oft-cited ‘proof’ of the equation.  Nuclear reactions do not support the theorem for the reasons outlined in this post.  As well the ‘mass’ used in the equation must exist.  Only existing matter can create matter.  Einstein’s fantasy world rejected this, believing that matter can magically be called upon to appear.  This alone negates the equation, but the postulates in this post add further weight to why the equation is of little use. 

E=MC2 is another classic example of Scientism.

Article Comments:

Related Articles:


5/25/2024:  Summarising the failures of the Big Bang. $cientism's very religious views.

5/11/2024:  The Inherent Problems of Newton’s and Einstein’s Physics. 'Laws' which don’t explain reality.

5/9/2024:  Gamma Ray Bursts and bursting the bubble of the Copernican principle

5/2/2024:  Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and the ‘axis of evil’

4/24/2024:  Cosmic Microwave Background radiation disproves the Big Bang religion.

4/20/2024:  Scientism and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey results. Mainstream cosmology in crisis.

4/13/2024:  4 reasons why E=mc2 is wrong. Einstein made very basic mistakes when interpreting this equation.

4/6/2024:  Positrons and plasma disprove Einstein, STR and E=mc2. Anderson's 1932 experiment.

4/4/2024:  Einstein was wrong. Quantum Mechanics, Plancktons and the real world of particles.

3/30/2024:  Einstein and his Ether. Refuting his own theories of Relativity and make-believe.

3/22/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part six).

3/15/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part five). The Earth's 'bulge', geosynchronous satellites,

3/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part four). The Foucault Pendulum

3/7/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part three)

3/3/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part two). Forces which Copernicanism cannot explain.

2/25/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part one).

2/21/2024:  Scientism and the Galileo myth. Another example of 'The Science' and its mendacity and propaganda.

2/18/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 4). Dayton Miller and 30 years of proofs which negate STR

2/17/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 3). Georges Sagnac and the ‘Sagnac effect’

2/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Scientism (part 2). Post-1905 experiments which found no movement of the Earth.

2/6/2024:  Is Heliocentricity a ‘proven fact’? Or is it just more Scientism dogma?

1/13/2024:  $cientism and Wind Turbines, aka the Bird Choppers, the Bat Manglers

12/16/2023:  A Federated model of World Government enabled by the religion of 'Science' or Scientism

12/11/2023:  Scientism and geology. Georges Cuvier and proofs from the 19th century about ‘catastrophism’

12/3/2023:  Scientism and Special Theory of Relativity. The paradigm is ending. Too many issues.

11/19/2023:  Scientism - James Webb Telescope and disproving the Banging Religion

11/12/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (b), A layman’s overview of STR

11/11/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (a), A layman’s overview of STR

11/4/2023:  $cientism: Germ and Virus theory nonsense. Béchamp’s experiments which disprove germ theory

11/3/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part II

10/27/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part I: From a real Scientist into Scientism.

10/26/2023:  Scientism and the myth of Long Ages. The Grand Canyon as an example.

10/18/2023:  Scientism and Long Ages. Isotopy and Isochrony dating suffer from a long litany of issues.

10/14/2023:  $cientism and Long-Ager Theology. Radio-Carbon dating and its inconvenient issues.

10/6/2023:  ‘Fossil Fuels’ and Scientism, from the 18th century to the modern era. Irrational dogma.

9/30/2023:  $cientism and Hydrocarbon reality. Hydrocarbons are NOT ‘Fossil Fuels’

9/22/2023:  $cientism and demonising Plant Food. A critical look at cars, ‘emissions’ and real science

9/17/2023:  Supernova’s and Banging. Models & metaphysics twisted to fit the narrative of the Banging religious

9/11/2023:  From Aristotle to the Big Bang and its metaphysical gospel.

9/2/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Part Two: ‘Redshifts’ and endless time.

8/26/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Confusion, bafflegab, arcane maths, money. Part one: Radiation

8/19/2023:  The Science Delusion. Big Bang Theory as an example of $cientism

8/18/2023:  "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health"

8/8/2023:  Alfred Russel Wallace on the deaths, injuries and fraud around 19th century vaccination.

8/5/2023:  Forgotten History and Pharmaceutical Criminality: 1918 'Spanish Flu' epidemic; 1976 ‘Swine’ Flu

8/5/2023:  The coming ‘Klimat’ Lockdowns based on $cientism.

7/29/2023:  Globaloney Boiling. The $cientism of ‘Klimat’

7/28/2023:  Georgian-era medical Quackery and ‘Professional Medicine’.

7/28/2023:  Mattias Desmet: 'The Psychology of Totalitarianism'. Mass acceptance of the Corona Fascism

7/23/2023:  US Deep State institutionalising the Corona Scamdemic through a new Federal Agency (OPPR)

7/21/2023:  $cientism and the Great Pharmaceutical Fraud

7/21/2023:  "Jabbed:How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, Government Stick It to You and Your Family"

7/18/2023:  Dr Chas Michael Higgins, ‘Horrors of Vaccination Exposed and Illustrated’ (1920)

7/13/2023:  Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Exposing the $cientism of a criminal complex

7/13/2023:  Dr Walter Hadwen, MD, MRCS, MRCP ‘The Case against Vaccination’ (1896)

7/11/2023:  Dr Charles Creighton, 'Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History' (1889)

7/5/2023:  The Covid Fascism and $cientism as a ‘global’ template for future ‘pandemics’

7/3/2023:  $cientism and its inherent Anti-White, Anti-Christian bigotry

7/3/2023:  $cience and the HIV 'virus' - another scam to create a U$ 500 billion industry

6/23/2023:  The Smallpox quackcine fraud - death rates went up post the Smallpox Stabs.

6/20/2023:  19th century Smallpox vaccine efficacy and data fraud. $cientism in the age of Jenner.

6/18/2023:  The Quack and the Vaxx-Religious: Saint Edward Jenner’s Smallpox drug failure, Government Investment

6/16/2023:  Overview of Saint Jenner the Quackcine Charlatan who created the criminal vaccine industry.

6/14/2023:  Scientism: The New Orthodoxy. A metaphysical and religious project.

6/14/2023:  Scientism and Saint Jenner, the case against the Apostle of the Smallpox Stabbination.

6/10/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky – The Good and the Not so Good. A peasant, layman’s view.

6/5/2023:  Velikovsky, Catastrophe and Einstein. Einstein was wrong. All hail 'The Science'.

6/4/2023:  'The Science' said there was life on Venus. So what happened?

5/30/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky and 'In the Beginning'. An an age of stupid, question everything.

5/24/2023:  Read the book: 'Dissolving Illusions (Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History)'.

5/5/2023:  The Religion of $cientism

5/1/2023:  A Brief history of $cientism

4/27/2023:  Scientism, Nominalism, Brzezinksi and the 'New World Order'

4/21/2023:  BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film

4/13/2023:  'Dark Moon. Apollo and the Whistle-blowers'. Mary Bennett, David Percy. 1999. Aulis publishing.

4/10/2023:  US Federal Government, from the Moon Hoax to the Corona Caliphate

4/3/2023:  Scientism, Hollywood, the Idiot box; and the Moon Landings. Red Pilling.

3/20/2023:  Reality and its discontents. Scientism.

3/11/2023:  The Religious Dogma of Government Sponsored Scientism

3/3/2023:  The War on Reality. Nitrogen, Food supply, Depopulation, the Great Replacement and $cience

2/18/2023:  Green Fascism, Net Zero, and Anti-human, Scientism

1/31/2023:  Scientism and the New Secular Religions

1/2/2023:  The Divine Right of $cience replacing Christianity

12/15/2022:  Scientism and the Cult of Lies

12/1/2022:  Scientism: From the ‘Enlightenment’ to Corona and Climate Thingy Changey.

9/19/2022:  Edward Feser, ‘Five Proofs of the Existence of God’

8/26/2022:  'Proofs of God', by Matthew Levering and the cult of modern ‘Scientism’.

6/22/2022:  Kenneth B. McIntyre, a critic of modern philosophy and ‘rationalism’

5/29/2022:  Edmund Burke, 'A vindication of natural society'. A book still relevant today.

5/11/2022:  Melanie Phillips and 'Upside Down', more real today than ever

4/28/2022:  Chateaubriand and his critique of the irrational 'French Enlightenment'

4/22/2022:  Russell Kirk and Ideology

4/6/2022:  Russell Kirk and Tradition

3/28/2022:  Isaiah Berlin and Monism

3/21/2022:  Eric Voegelin and the Religion of Reason

3/16/2022:  F. A. Hayek and the Road to Serfdom (Corona, Authoritarianism, Irrational governance)

3/8/2022:  C. S. Lewis and the Abolition of Man (and reason)

2/21/2022:  Michael Polanyi, a scientist protesting scientism

2/7/2022:  Heidegger’s Critique of Rationalism

12/5/2021:  Wittgenstein, modern cults and the abasement of truth with language games

10/26/2021:  Nietzsche and the end of Reason and the fantasy of Democracy

9/10/2021:  Alexis de Tocqueville – a critic of the irrational Enlightenment

8/30/2021:  Semmelweis reflex. Rejecting truth due to your worldview.

8/18/2021:  Follow 'The Science' they scream. Which 'science'? From who and why?

7/27/2021:  The Religious Cults of Scientism are anti-reality, Christophobic, Fascist.

7/19/2021:  Edmund Burke: From ‘The Enlightenment’ to the cult and Religion of Rona

6/14/2021:  THE Enlightenment and the erasure of Homo Sapiens

6/7/2021:  ‘The’ Enlightenment and Scientism and the cult of non-Science

5/26/2021:  Scientism and the scientific mafia of establishment non-science

5/9/2021:  In the modern Dark Ages, 'I Jab therefore I am' is considered 'science'

4/2/2021:  Pope Francis, Bishop Spong, Barry Wilson and the Evil within the Church of Christ.

11/19/2020:  The cult of Science - face diapers as an example in the post-truth world.

9/8/2020:  GlobaloneyWarming Science Fiction

8/15/2020:  Michael Crichton and the Age of Ignorance parading as Science

8/5/2020:  C.S. Lewis and 'The Abolition of Man' by Steve Turley

7/4/2020:  Rome, Greece, Islam - primitive philosophies with primitive ideals - unlike Christianity

3/10/2020:  Atheists have destroyed the credibility of science

1/4/2020:  Globaloney-Warming: 43 Failed Green Fascist Predictions - Zero correct, every single one wrong

12/19/2019:  Fake Climate Science and made up numbers: Australia

12/11/2019:  The Green Reich: Global Warming to the Green Tyranny, Drieu Godefridi

11/26/2019:  The Age of Stupid, the Cult of Stupid: GlobaloneyWarming, Climate-Change, Climate-Emergency

11/19/2019:  The Climate cult of Stupid, Corruption, Fiction

11/7/2016:  Church of Evolution and the impossibility of chance forming anything

10/23/2016:  Big Bang theology and Virgin Births. Evolution and Scientific, Cosmological Dogma.

9/21/2016:  'Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed' by Douglas Axe

7/20/2016:  Evolution, Embryos and Cult of Science fraud

7/12/2016:  Political Science and the cut of Scientism

5/2/2016:  The cult and unholy church of 'Science'. Lies, fraud, propaganda, and of course money and power.

2/25/2016:  Cult of science; magical formation of life, planets and trillions of Earths!

2/5/2016:  Alan Fensin, '13 facts that humans do not cause global warming'.

1/14/2016:  John Hudson Tiner’s 'History of Medicine and Founder of Modern Medicine: Louis Pasteur'

7/29/2015:  Maxwell, Morley and Einstein. No conflict between faith and reason.

4/23/2015:  There is no science, within a cult of science.

1/23/2015:  2014 one of the coldest years in the real record. Globaloneywarming. A cult of fraud.

1/14/2015:  What is Science? It is not Scientism or the cult of Science.

1/2/2015:  Watermelons: How Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, James Delingpole

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/18/2014:  Bruno Latour and the cult of science. Fetishes in place of facts.

11/23/2014:  Consensus Science. There is life on the Moon, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars....

11/10/2014:  Cults of Scientism; no science, lots of dogma, cant, theology and miracles

10/14/2014:  Scientism and the cult of Fraud er Globaloneywarming

10/9/2014:  Keynesian-Central Bank 'Scientism'. Central Bank 'models' vs reality

10/6/2014:  The Quackery of Lysenko, Globaloneywarming, Darwinism.

8/15/2014:  'Literalists' and Scientism, and the cults of pseudo-science

7/13/2014:  Darwinism and the cult of scientific materialism

6/30/2014:  Aristotle's non-science cult of scientism. Hand-waving and conjecture is not science

6/26/2014:  Velikovsky's importance - he challenged the dogmatic cult of Darwin