RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII -

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 12, 2023

Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (b), A layman’s overview of STR

STR, mathematical models, and their implications.

by StFerdIII



Papal infallibility

The first post discussed the theory of STR and what the theory is trying to achieve.  There are 2 postulates or Einstein’s ‘laws’, which the science says are infallible and proven. 

The first postulate is that the laws of physics apply to all objects universally, as long as an ether or medium is not present.  ‘Laws of physics’ refers to the Catholic Galileo’s work in the 17th century and his law of inertia, summarised as: "Objects move with constant speed in a straight line when no external agent is acting on them”.

The second rule or postulate is that the speed of light or its velocity is constant for all objects regardless of their motion.  Again, this is similar to Galileo’s own experimental proofs. 

Einstein’s ex-cathedra postulate pronouncements are now deemed infallible and eternal.  These postulates surround and protect his STR theory.  The postulate and rules by themselves may well be sensible.  I don’t think they prove much of anything if we extend the postulates to the STR itself or the physical world.  Postulate one is basically unprovable.  Postulate 2 would not hold outside of a vacuum.  STR itself, in toto, is largely premised of course, on mathematics and in particular endless pages of dense equations. 

As Einstein supposedly remarked, not more than a dozen people on the planet would understand the theorem.  Maybe that was the whole point.  The layman with his curiosity and his weathered dirty hand on a shovel handle, may inquire as to what connection exists between the endless equations with their odd symbols, and the physical world.  He is answered with more maths and sometimes ridicule.

This post carries on from the introductory post, looking specifically at the mathematical foundations of the theory.

Galilean Transformation

By 1632 the Catholic Galileo had developed complicated equations which would be the basis of mechanical physics.  These equations described the transformation between the coordinates of two inertial frames (objects on a grid).  The equations are the basis of STR theory.  In essence Galileo’s transformation model can be summarised as: 

x1  = vt -> where x is a coordinate of an event in one inertial frame (called S usually, with S being an object eg a moving train); xis the coordinates of the same event in another inertial frame (S') moving at a constant velocity

y= y  -> the same as x in the context of y

z= z  -> same as x, y, in the context of z

t= t where t = inertial time

In this theorem the transformations in the y and z directions are identity transformations, which means that there is no change along those axes.  The above is very similar to what is deployed in the STR.

Using the above maths Galileo describe the transformations between frames of reference at speeds much less than the speed of light.  It is not relativistic.  The theory cannot describe the relationship between space and time at relativistic speeds.  The Lorentz transformation theory by contrast, can articulate space and time at all relativistic speeds, including at the speed of light. 

STR maths & Lorentz

The Galilean transformation was superseded by the Dutchman Hendrik Lorentz’s equations or the ‘Lorentz transformations’, published in 1895.  It is undeniable that much of STR is derived from Lorentz though Einstein did not credit the Dutchman.  It is well-documented that Albert Einstein corresponded with Lorentz, and he had studied Lorentz's work.  The Lorentz transformations describe the mathematical relationship between the coordinates of events in different inertial frames and are the core of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

In their correspondence, Lorentz and Einstein discussed various aspects of electromagnetism, and Einstein was familiar with Lorentz's efforts to reconcile the phenomena of electromagnetism with the principles of classical Galilean mechanics.  Einstein took Lorentz’s work and extended it, adding the 2 postulates analysed in the first post, and E=mc2 or the conversion of energy and mass.  This would be proven in nuclear reactions.  E is the energy of the object, m its mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. 

In reading both theorems I am not convinced that Einsteins’ theory is that much different.  Einstein uses Lorentz whole hog and adds E=mc2, a formulae developed by others though he stated he arrived at it independently.  I don’t find this convincing.  For the record, E=mc2 is initially an output of electro-magnetic theory, with Maxwell and others (for example, the British scientist J.J. Thomson, in 1881, and the Italian Olinto De Pretto, in 1903), being its true inventors, not Einstein.  Einstein dispensed with the ‘ether’ (luminiferous particles which interact with light and electro-magnetism, which is indeed different than the idea of ‘dark matter’ which does not interact with light).  He reformed the velocity of light to be a constant in a vacuum as well as proposing the exchange of energy with mass. Lorentz’s ideas are the real foundation of STR.

Lorentz’s theory

Lorentz’s calculations run to many pages.  In summary and to simplify some core aspects of the theory found in textbooks and on sites would be the following.


We can see the similarity with, and the use of Galileo’s transformation equations.

Lorentz’s theorem can be summarised in the following way:

1.     -t = time and x = space coordinates for one reference object, called S, moving at a certain velocity or v, relative to another reference object (or frame) called S1

2.     v = the relative velocity between two inertial frames of reference or 2 objects within the same or different coordinates

3.     -For both objects S and S1, coordinates or location maps covering both objects, are calculated using the variables, y, z an y1, z1 for both objects along the y and z axes

4.     -The z axis is a 3rd dimension axis to imitate space is added to the above 2-dimensional diagram (the z axis was added in 1908, by Einstein’s math professor Hermann Minkowski)

5.     -c is the speed of light (for Einstein, this meant only a vacuum)

6.     The symbol γ is gamma or the Lorentz factor given below

The full equations and explanations can be found in any physics textbook online.  Many sites possess calculators where you can stroll through the theorem against a thought or paper experiment. 

The maths is difficult to wade through. 

A key difference between the 2 theorems is that Lorentz, like Maxwell and others, believed in an ether, or a medium in space which could interact with and propagate light, whereas Einstein did not.  However, both theories are so similar that they are conflated with each other, with STR categorised as the ‘Lorentz-Einstein model’.  Lorentz’s theory in and of itself is not relativistic, but Einstein’s is.  However, proofs offered for STR include the relativistic outputs of Lorentz’s equations.  This is both tautological and usually tangential.  You cannot use part of a theorem to prove the theory.

What does it mean?

The maths is abstract but can be applied to moving objects.  In his 1905 paper, Einstein used the analogy of a train and an observer on a train platform.  Assume we have an observer on a train platform, watching a train moving past the station at 60 mph.  Let’s put two objects emitting light, one at the beginning of the train, and one at the end of the train.  Calculations can be made to show the separation in time between when the lights flashed as seen by either the platform observer, or a second observer seated in the train in the middle of the car. 

Logically the person in the train would never see the flashing lights but that reality is dismissed in favour of trying to prove the relativistic nature of objects in motion and their light signals as seen by the 2 observers, one static on a platform, the other in a train moving at 60 mph away from the platform.  What does it mean?

1.     The Lorentz transformation purportedly shows that time and space are not absolute and can be different for observers in relative motion.

2.     The Lorentz factor accounts for the relativistic effects of time dilation and length contraction with the length (or mass) of an object becoming smaller as it moves away from an observer.  

Lorentz offers the ‘transformation’ equations to show relativity in space and time.  He also uses his ‘factor’ to ‘prove’ relativity between objects in time dilation (the twin’s paradox) and length contraction. 

Based on the above ideas, perhaps the key point in special relativity is that the relationships between space and time coordinates are intertwined.  Observers moving relative to each other at a constant velocity will experience different perceptions of time and space.  


As already stated a major addition to Lorentz’s theorem by Einstein, is the formulation of Energy = mass x the speed of light in a vacuum square (E=mc2).  This theory states that mass and energy are interchangeable.  Nuclear reactions offer proof of this.  Fair enough.  For example, a small amount of mass may be converted into a large amount of energy. 

Within STR the mainstream narrative offers that this equation is a key element in describing how energy and mass are observed in different inertial reference frames moving relative to each other.  I am not sure this is true.  It can lead to theories about time dilation for example, or as already stated, length contraction where an object that is moving away relative to an observer will appear contracted in the direction of motion (which may be incorrect, more later).  

Much of this is only theory and still open to dispute.  Though E=mc², is a fundamental expression in the theory of relativity, it is not and cannot be used as a direct proof of time dilation or the concept of different clocks running at different speeds.  This would be tautological.  At best it helps describe such phenomena if they exist. 

Implications of STR

The main areas of importance of STR, cited within the mainstream science literature include:

1.     Time-dilation (not as clear cut as presented, scanty proofs, but can be observed),

2.     Red-shift calculations (absolutely nothing to do with STR and eviscerated here),

3.     GPS systems (if STR did not exist these would still work),

4.     Bending of light (this seems correct). 

Two out of four.  The above are not the vital points about STR. There are two implications of STR in my opinion.  More here

Article Comments:

Related Articles:


4/20/2024:  Scientism and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey results. Mainstream cosmology in crisis.

4/13/2024:  4 reasons why E=mc2 is wrong. Einstein made very basic mistakes when interpreting this equation.

4/6/2024:  Positrons and plasma disprove Einstein, STR and E=mc2. Anderson's 1932 experiment.

4/4/2024:  Einstein was wrong. Quantum Mechanics, Plancktons and the real world of particles.

3/30/2024:  Einstein and his Ether. Refuting his own theories of Relativity and make-believe.

3/22/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part six).

3/15/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part five). The Earth's 'bulge', geosynchronous satellites,

3/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part four). The Foucault Pendulum

3/7/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part three)

3/3/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part two). Forces which Copernicanism cannot explain.

2/25/2024:  Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part one).

2/21/2024:  Scientism and the Galileo myth. Another example of 'The Science' and its mendacity and propaganda.

2/18/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 4). Dayton Miller and 30 years of proofs which negate STR

2/17/2024:  Heliocentricty and Scientism (part 3). Georges Sagnac and the ‘Sagnac effect’

2/10/2024:  Heliocentricity and Scientism (part 2). Post-1905 experiments which found no movement of the Earth.

2/6/2024:  Is Heliocentricity a ‘proven fact’? Or is it just more Scientism dogma?

1/13/2024:  $cientism and Wind Turbines, aka the Bird Choppers, the Bat Manglers

12/16/2023:  A Federated model of World Government enabled by the religion of 'Science' or Scientism

12/11/2023:  Scientism and geology. Georges Cuvier and proofs from the 19th century about ‘catastrophism’

12/3/2023:  Scientism and Special Theory of Relativity. The paradigm is ending. Too many issues.

11/19/2023:  Scientism - James Webb Telescope and disproving the Banging Religion

11/12/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (b), A layman’s overview of STR

11/11/2023:  Scientism and the Special Theory of Relativity. Part One (a), A layman’s overview of STR

11/4/2023:  $cientism: Germ and Virus theory nonsense. Béchamp’s experiments which disprove germ theory

11/3/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part II

10/27/2023:  $cientism and Louis Pasteur as a case study. Part I: From a real Scientist into Scientism.

10/26/2023:  Scientism and the myth of Long Ages. The Grand Canyon as an example.

10/18/2023:  Scientism and Long Ages. Isotopy and Isochrony dating suffer from a long litany of issues.

10/14/2023:  $cientism and Long-Ager Theology. Radio-Carbon dating and its inconvenient issues.

10/6/2023:  ‘Fossil Fuels’ and Scientism, from the 18th century to the modern era. Irrational dogma.

9/30/2023:  $cientism and Hydrocarbon reality. Hydrocarbons are NOT ‘Fossil Fuels’

9/22/2023:  $cientism and demonising Plant Food. A critical look at cars, ‘emissions’ and real science

9/17/2023:  Supernova’s and Banging. Models & metaphysics twisted to fit the narrative of the Banging religious

9/11/2023:  From Aristotle to the Big Bang and its metaphysical gospel.

9/2/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Part Two: ‘Redshifts’ and endless time.

8/26/2023:  ‘The Big Bang’ and $cientism. Confusion, bafflegab, arcane maths, money. Part one: Radiation

8/19/2023:  The Science Delusion. Big Bang Theory as an example of $cientism

8/18/2023:  "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health"

8/8/2023:  Alfred Russel Wallace on the deaths, injuries and fraud around 19th century vaccination.

8/5/2023:  Forgotten History and Pharmaceutical Criminality: 1918 'Spanish Flu' epidemic; 1976 ‘Swine’ Flu

8/5/2023:  The coming ‘Klimat’ Lockdowns based on $cientism.

7/29/2023:  Globaloney Boiling. The $cientism of ‘Klimat’

7/28/2023:  Georgian-era medical Quackery and ‘Professional Medicine’.

7/28/2023:  Mattias Desmet: 'The Psychology of Totalitarianism'. Mass acceptance of the Corona Fascism

7/23/2023:  US Deep State institutionalising the Corona Scamdemic through a new Federal Agency (OPPR)

7/21/2023:  $cientism and the Great Pharmaceutical Fraud

7/21/2023:  "Jabbed:How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, Government Stick It to You and Your Family"

7/18/2023:  Dr Chas Michael Higgins, ‘Horrors of Vaccination Exposed and Illustrated’ (1920)

7/13/2023:  Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Exposing the $cientism of a criminal complex

7/13/2023:  Dr Walter Hadwen, MD, MRCS, MRCP ‘The Case against Vaccination’ (1896)

7/11/2023:  Dr Charles Creighton, 'Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History' (1889)

7/5/2023:  The Covid Fascism and $cientism as a ‘global’ template for future ‘pandemics’

7/3/2023:  $cientism and its inherent Anti-White, Anti-Christian bigotry

7/3/2023:  $cience and the HIV 'virus' - another scam to create a U$ 500 billion industry

6/23/2023:  The Smallpox quackcine fraud - death rates went up post the Smallpox Stabs.

6/20/2023:  19th century Smallpox vaccine efficacy and data fraud. $cientism in the age of Jenner.

6/18/2023:  The Quack and the Vaxx-Religious: Saint Edward Jenner’s Smallpox drug failure, Government Investment

6/16/2023:  Overview of Saint Jenner the Quackcine Charlatan who created the criminal vaccine industry.

6/14/2023:  Scientism: The New Orthodoxy. A metaphysical and religious project.

6/14/2023:  Scientism and Saint Jenner, the case against the Apostle of the Smallpox Stabbination.

6/10/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky – The Good and the Not so Good. A peasant, layman’s view.

6/5/2023:  Velikovsky, Catastrophe and Einstein. Einstein was wrong. All hail 'The Science'.

6/4/2023:  'The Science' said there was life on Venus. So what happened?

5/30/2023:  Immanuel Velikovsky and 'In the Beginning'. An an age of stupid, question everything.

5/24/2023:  Read the book: 'Dissolving Illusions (Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History)'.

5/5/2023:  The Religion of $cientism

5/1/2023:  A Brief history of $cientism

4/27/2023:  Scientism, Nominalism, Brzezinksi and the 'New World Order'

4/21/2023:  BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film

4/13/2023:  'Dark Moon. Apollo and the Whistle-blowers'. Mary Bennett, David Percy. 1999. Aulis publishing.

4/10/2023:  US Federal Government, from the Moon Hoax to the Corona Caliphate

4/3/2023:  Scientism, Hollywood, the Idiot box; and the Moon Landings. Red Pilling.

3/20/2023:  Reality and its discontents. Scientism.

3/11/2023:  The Religious Dogma of Government Sponsored Scientism

3/3/2023:  The War on Reality. Nitrogen, Food supply, Depopulation, the Great Replacement and $cience

2/18/2023:  Green Fascism, Net Zero, and Anti-human, Scientism

1/31/2023:  Scientism and the New Secular Religions

1/2/2023:  The Divine Right of $cience replacing Christianity

12/15/2022:  Scientism and the Cult of Lies

12/1/2022:  Scientism: From the ‘Enlightenment’ to Corona and Climate Thingy Changey.

9/19/2022:  Edward Feser, ‘Five Proofs of the Existence of God’

8/26/2022:  'Proofs of God', by Matthew Levering and the cult of modern ‘Scientism’.

6/22/2022:  Kenneth B. McIntyre, a critic of modern philosophy and ‘rationalism’

5/29/2022:  Edmund Burke, 'A vindication of natural society'. A book still relevant today.

5/11/2022:  Melanie Phillips and 'Upside Down', more real today than ever

4/28/2022:  Chateaubriand and his critique of the irrational 'French Enlightenment'

4/22/2022:  Russell Kirk and Ideology

4/6/2022:  Russell Kirk and Tradition

3/28/2022:  Isaiah Berlin and Monism

3/21/2022:  Eric Voegelin and the Religion of Reason

3/16/2022:  F. A. Hayek and the Road to Serfdom (Corona, Authoritarianism, Irrational governance)

3/8/2022:  C. S. Lewis and the Abolition of Man (and reason)

2/21/2022:  Michael Polanyi, a scientist protesting scientism

2/7/2022:  Heidegger’s Critique of Rationalism

12/5/2021:  Wittgenstein, modern cults and the abasement of truth with language games

10/26/2021:  Nietzsche and the end of Reason and the fantasy of Democracy

9/10/2021:  Alexis de Tocqueville – a critic of the irrational Enlightenment

8/30/2021:  Semmelweis reflex. Rejecting truth due to your worldview.

8/18/2021:  Follow 'The Science' they scream. Which 'science'? From who and why?

7/27/2021:  The Religious Cults of Scientism are anti-reality, Christophobic, Fascist.

7/19/2021:  Edmund Burke: From ‘The Enlightenment’ to the cult and Religion of Rona

6/14/2021:  THE Enlightenment and the erasure of Homo Sapiens

6/7/2021:  ‘The’ Enlightenment and Scientism and the cult of non-Science

5/26/2021:  Scientism and the scientific mafia of establishment non-science

5/9/2021:  In the modern Dark Ages, 'I Jab therefore I am' is considered 'science'

4/2/2021:  Pope Francis, Bishop Spong, Barry Wilson and the Evil within the Church of Christ.

11/19/2020:  The cult of Science - face diapers as an example in the post-truth world.

9/8/2020:  GlobaloneyWarming Science Fiction

8/15/2020:  Michael Crichton and the Age of Ignorance parading as Science

8/5/2020:  C.S. Lewis and 'The Abolition of Man' by Steve Turley

7/4/2020:  Rome, Greece, Islam - primitive philosophies with primitive ideals - unlike Christianity

3/10/2020:  Atheists have destroyed the credibility of science

1/4/2020:  Globaloney-Warming: 43 Failed Green Fascist Predictions - Zero correct, every single one wrong

12/19/2019:  Fake Climate Science and made up numbers: Australia

12/11/2019:  The Green Reich: Global Warming to the Green Tyranny, Drieu Godefridi

11/26/2019:  The Age of Stupid, the Cult of Stupid: GlobaloneyWarming, Climate-Change, Climate-Emergency

11/19/2019:  The Climate cult of Stupid, Corruption, Fiction

11/7/2016:  Church of Evolution and the impossibility of chance forming anything

10/23/2016:  Big Bang theology and Virgin Births. Evolution and Scientific, Cosmological Dogma.

9/21/2016:  'Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed' by Douglas Axe

7/20/2016:  Evolution, Embryos and Cult of Science fraud

7/12/2016:  Political Science and the cut of Scientism

5/2/2016:  The cult and unholy church of 'Science'. Lies, fraud, propaganda, and of course money and power.

2/25/2016:  Cult of science; magical formation of life, planets and trillions of Earths!

2/5/2016:  Alan Fensin, '13 facts that humans do not cause global warming'.

1/14/2016:  John Hudson Tiner’s 'History of Medicine and Founder of Modern Medicine: Louis Pasteur'

7/29/2015:  Maxwell, Morley and Einstein. No conflict between faith and reason.

4/23/2015:  There is no science, within a cult of science.

1/23/2015:  2014 one of the coldest years in the real record. Globaloneywarming. A cult of fraud.

1/14/2015:  What is Science? It is not Scientism or the cult of Science.

1/2/2015:  Watermelons: How Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, James Delingpole

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/18/2014:  Bruno Latour and the cult of science. Fetishes in place of facts.

11/23/2014:  Consensus Science. There is life on the Moon, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars....

11/10/2014:  Cults of Scientism; no science, lots of dogma, cant, theology and miracles

10/14/2014:  Scientism and the cult of Fraud er Globaloneywarming

10/9/2014:  Keynesian-Central Bank 'Scientism'. Central Bank 'models' vs reality

10/6/2014:  The Quackery of Lysenko, Globaloneywarming, Darwinism.

8/15/2014:  'Literalists' and Scientism, and the cults of pseudo-science

7/13/2014:  Darwinism and the cult of scientific materialism

6/30/2014:  Aristotle's non-science cult of scientism. Hand-waving and conjecture is not science

6/26/2014:  Velikovsky's importance - he challenged the dogmatic cult of Darwin